ENVISCID
  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Publications
    • Papuga Publications
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • News and Media Coverage
    • Poster Presentations
  • Weather@Wayne
  • Our Blogs
    • EVS News Blitz
    • ENVISCID in Action
  • My Courses
  • Facilities and Equipment

ESG 1500 News Blitz

sharing environmental science through the news 

PFAS detected in the Arctic for the first time

10/21/2020

9 Comments

 
By: ​Mckenzie Weiss
Summary:  Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances are synthetic organofluorine chemical compounds that are found in many household items such as cleaning products, paints, nonstick cookware, and stain resisting coats found on carpet and other fabrics. This substance has raised concern because of its potential toxicity to humans and wildlife. It is also known as the “forever chemical” due to its persistence in the environment and how long it takes to degrade. PFAS has been found to be linked to a wide range of health problems from different types of cancer to endocrine disruption. In recent studies, PFAS has been newly found in the Arctic seawater. On a research ship, a team collected water samples along two currents going into and out of the Arctic ocean and along a path from Europe's North sea to the Arctic Ocean. Higher levels of PFAS were detected in the water exiting the arctic compared to the water entering the Arctic. When discussing the effects of the substance on wildlife, it has been found to be linked to cause harm in many things such as the immune system, it can cause kidney infection, and affect liver function of bottlenose dolphins as well as the immune systems of sea otters. A build-up of PFAS in Arctic polar bears can cause neurological damage and cause trouble with reproduction. Due to the substance being found more exiting the Arctic than entering, it indicates that the PFAS is coming from the atmosphere and not the ocean and it is considered that snow and ice are what is holding these compounds. We have yet to discover something that accurately lowers the levels of PFAS in the Arctic, but this issue needs to be evaluated. 
Why we should care? I think we should care about this topic simply because of the harm it is causing to our wildlife and humans. It causes so much harm to wildlife among a variety of species and a variety of different health effects.
Picture
Photo Credit: https://phys.org/news/2020-07-pfas-compound-arctic-seawater.html
​Example Article. 
https://www.cnn.com/interactive/2018/06/world/antarctica/   
and
https://www.inverse.com/science/genx-pfas-discovered-in-arctic

I found this to be particularly interesting for a few reasons. One being that I never knew it was part of our everyday life but it is still harmful to us humans. As mentioned before, PFAS is in household products such as cleaning products, paints, non-stick cookware, and stain resisting coats. I never knew about this substance and the harm it causes which made it more interesting and made me more aware of the harmful effects of it so I can try to be cautious if/when using any of the products that contain it. The article went into depth about the substance and its compound which I found really interesting. I also found it interesting because I do not typically hear about this kind of subject like I should so I enjoyed doing research on it and learning about it.​
Science in Action.
Dr. Cora Young is an Associate Professor and Rogers Chair, Department of Chemistry, York University.

York University atmospheric chemist Cora Young as well as Amila De Silva, a chemist at Environment and climate change, did research and came across traces of PFAS in Arctic ice. She decided to focus on smaller compounds that have not been studied as much as others. There were previous hypotheses that these smaller compounds were rising, but Cora Young was one of those to prove it. They found that PFAS, among others, have been rising since as early as 1990. They also found traces of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA), and per fluoropropionic acid (PFPrA). This information is of course relevant to the topic because it provides further information about PFAS, the levels, and how long it has been rising for. 
9 Comments
Sophia Price
10/22/2020 10:17:34

I agree, we should care because there is most likely something less harmful we can use.

Reply
Justin Yarrington
10/22/2020 10:18:29

I appreciated learning about PFA's because I had personally never heard of them. It was interesting to hear how it is referred to as the forever chemical. I also really enjoyed the CNN resource that you included. I think something like that can get many more people interested on the topic.

Reply
Hunter Cook
10/22/2020 10:19:53

This is pretty eye opening for certain everyday products that I had no idea caused such a negative effect to the environment.
One thing that confuses me is how most of the items listed that are made with PFAs aren't really gaseous, so I wonder how they are more of an atmospheric problem.
Perhaps the factories which make them are releasing the chemical into the atmosphere.
Regardless, hopefully they find some useful information because if it has an adverse effect on species that are already endangered that is very problematic.

Reply
Zahra Williams
10/22/2020 10:20:19

I agree with this article a lot. It is our fault that all this plastic is in the ocean and it is our responsibility to clean it up. We are hurting the marine life in the water as well as ourselves. We need to take accountability for our actions.

Reply
Ivy Eifert
10/22/2020 10:20:57

I am surprised to learn that these pollutants have been rising since 1990, because they do not get talked about often. These greatly harm the ecosystems in the Arctic, affecting us through a loss of biodiversity.

Reply
Zane Hammoud
10/22/2020 10:27:28

it was crazy to see how long these issues go on without much being said by governments. It will truly affect us in the long run hopefully it will be before it is too late. We have some majors problems to deal with ahead.

Reply
Shelby Wilson
10/22/2020 13:26:03

I thought this was so interesting to learn about and also a little scary. I had no idea that things we use everyday can impact the environment so much. We know that in the long run the PFAs will affect us because they have been around since 1990 and it is effecting us now. It is unsettling that those household products are so harmful and we shouldn’t use them. If we do use those products (which I know I do right now) we need to be careful.

Reply
Mallory Evatz
10/23/2020 18:04:03

You did a great job explains this topic. I found it really interesting because I have never even heard of PFAs. I think now that we are learning how dangerous they are to not only our oceans and wildlife but to us, we need to use products with our PFAs. We are creating household products we use everyday that endangering ourselves so we really need to stop including these in household products.

Reply
Allison Partin
10/23/2020 20:47:24

It was very interesting to learn about PFAs, especially since it is not that well known of a topic. Honestly, it should be more thought of and talked about since it is considered, as you said, the "forever chemical", especially since we use them everyday!

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Author

    Students of ESG 1500

    Archives

    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    November 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Our Team
  • Publications
    • Papuga Publications
    • Theses and Dissertations
    • News and Media Coverage
    • Poster Presentations
  • Weather@Wayne
  • Our Blogs
    • EVS News Blitz
    • ENVISCID in Action
  • My Courses
  • Facilities and Equipment