|
By: Sullivan Stack Summary. The International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is the United Nations’ primary forum for discussing the scientific basis and effects of climate change. Founded in 1998, this organization serves to educate world leaders on climate change so that they may implement policies that could potentially slow or reverse climate change. In a report published in August of this year, the panel described the role that methane plays as a greenhouse gas and a contributing factor to rising atmospheric temperatures. Methane (CH4) is an abundant and naturally occurring gas that is present in large quantities both on and within the earth. Because of its recent popularity as an alternative to coal, it has become the leading fossil fuel for energy production in most of the United States. While methane is often held as being a far superior and cleaner alternative to coal, the damage that it has caused our climate extends far beyond the CO2 it emits when burned for energy. Despite making up an incredibly small proportion of the atmosphere, methane is approximately 80 times more potent of a greenhouse gas than CO2, and is thus the second leading contributor to rising global temperatures annually. However, because of this immense impact (relative to concentration) that methane has on the climate, it presents an exceptional target for world leaders looking to decrease their countries’ contribution to rising global temperatures. The report lays out many sources of methane that could be targeted to reduce this impact. While the largest single source of methane emissions is natural wetland areas, a significant quantity comes from agricultural and industrial practices. Rice paddy farming and livestock rearing are the two largest man-made sources of methane, with the third largest being fossil fuel companies. Furthermore, the report details how increasing global temperatures will create more favorable conditions for the microorganisms that produce methane in natural wetlands environments. This positive feedback loop has the potential to further increase the amount of methane released into the atmosphere, and will therefore increase global temperatures as well. With the true costs of methane production becoming clearer, it is vital that countries move away from these practices. Decreasing the demand for meat and rice would both present a massive decrease in methane emissions. However, developing countries represent a large percentage of these emissions and rely on both of these products to feed billions of people. For this reason, it would be much more beneficial to create regulations for oil and gas industries. Many of these companies are among the largest single-point sources of methane, and strictly regulating them would arguably be the easiest and most effective way of cutting down on greenhouse gas emissions. Even this partial decrease would likely stop the rapid increase in global temperatures and subsequent increase in methane production from natural sources. Why we should care? Climate change is perhaps the largest threat facing humanity as we move further into the 21st century, and reducing methane emissions is an important step on the path toward combatting it.  "Methane gas pumping station" by Distraction Limited is licensed with CC BY 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Example Article. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02287-y This article particularly excels at communicating the data contained within the highly technical (and over 400-page) IPCC report on methane and the role it plays in climate change. In addition, the article expands on the ideas laid out by the IPCC, and even begins to offer some potential solutions to the problem of methane emissions. For example, by expanding on the idea that many of the nonpoint sources of methane production are relatively unknown, the article briefly explains how we are beginning to use satellites to better find these sources in areas where they might otherwise be unobtainable. This all serves to create an informative yet hopeful tone that is so often absent when talking about something as dire as climate change. Science in Action.
Dr. Ilissa Ocko is a Senior Climate Scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund (EDF). Dr. Ocko's research focuses predominantly on using models to study the effects that aerosols and greenhouse gasses (also called short-lived climate pollutants) can have on the environment. She also studies how these types of pollution can be mitigated. Because of this, her work has led her to study methane extensively, and she has many publications on the relationship between methane and climate change. In her work at the EDF, she has also published numerous opinion articles on the need for methane to be addressed in governmental policy, including two directly discussing the IPCC climate report. Ocko is a particularly relevant scientist because she not only studies the effects that methane can have on the climate, she also is a scientific communicator who is passionate about explaining and clarifying research, such as the IPCC report, to the public and world leaders.
4 Comments
11/22/2021 14:45:43
Stopping methane losses is a environmental is a environmental must have for our future.. Livestock accounts for the majority of this methane. If humans would stop eating so much meat it could help global warming drastically. Fracking has unleashed rich methane sources from the ground. These sources are also part of the cause of global warming. Pipelines transport methane to processing plants. Stopping methane from being lost in the atmosphere will help our planet tremensely. 11/22/2021 19:04:25
Hey Sullivan! I definitely agree that capping methane emissions from oil companies is a necessary step. I also think that we could and should target the meat/dairy industry here in the US, as factory farming factors a number of increased CO2 emissions. Grass fed cattle actually often don’t have much of an impact. Deforestation, loss of biodiversity, both to grow a monoculture crop like corn and soy are detrimental parts of our current livestock system. I know this is a small point to your post but methane from cow burps and farts are a hot topic when it comes to slowing emissions, so much so that people have invented masks to capture cow’s burps, rather than addressing the root of the cause of overconsuming meat. Regardless, what I am most concerned about is the abundance of methane trapped in permafrost that, as you mention once thawed, will likely help to create a positive feedback loop of increased methane release and higher global temperatures. Revolution now.
Amanda Turner
11/24/2021 02:07:04
This was really enlightening! It feels wrong that, in order to feed people in large quantities, we have to create such dangerous emissions. Unfortunately, the industries that create some of the emissions will never stop, as their main priority is profit, not the planet. It is horrible knowing that we are already on the way to destruction of the planet, and many people do not care at all.
Hailey bernys
12/21/2021 21:08:39
Every time I think of climate change I think about how many people truly believe it doesn’t exist and I find that so crazy that they can turn their backs on such a large issue. Specific to your post, I thought it was really interesting talking about how our emissions have increased with growing populations but, it does make sense. The more people here the more food required and they just mass produce tons of foods paying little attention to the affects on the world. It always upsets me to think about how profit is more important than the planet for so many large companies and people in general. I feel like there need to be strict laws on emissions and pollution between large companies. Eventually there won’t be a planet left to profit off of though. Methane is the one I mostly think of when I think of emissions and the planet because I grew up learning about this emission specifically in science classes. Leave a Reply. |
AuthorStudents of ESG 1500 Archives
December 2021
Categories |
RSS Feed